2009/6/22 明�X <shi.min...@gmail.com>: > On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 4:11 PM, > thveillon.debian<thveillon.deb...@googlemail.com> wrote: >>>Sebastian Günther wrote: >>> * 明�X (shi.min...@gmail.com) [22.06.09 03:18]: >>>> I want to keep the programs in my system all written in c/c++, no >>>> python or perl or any other programming languages, is it possible to >>>> reach it? I removed the 2 packages, python and perl, from my system, >>>> and of cause, I losed my desktop, is it possible to install a desktop >>>> manager without perl and python? which is the proper desktop manager? >>>> thanks >>>> >>>> >>> >>> # apt-cache --installed rdepends (perl|python) >>> >>> should show you which packages depend on perl resp. python. Then you can >>> decide wether you can live without them. >>> >>> Sebastian >>> >> >> But aren't "perl" or "python" packages just metapackages acting like >> glue for all the others in the section ? I don't know if removing them >> will have any effect on the libs already installed. >> And doesn't the package configuration system needs python and/or perl >> stuff ? > yes, i hate it so much! if i remove python, the whole gnome > environment are removed; if i remove perl, the whole xorg system is > removed. I don't think it's a good design to make python or perl so > bottom, especially for people who do not like python and perl, like > me. >> >> aptitude search ~S~i~s'(perl|python)' returns packages that look pretty >> low-level stuff to me, most of which I have never installed manually but >> were dragged in as dependencies. >> >> Looks like a strange idea to me to run a "one programming language only" >> system, it would hint that there's a "one fits all" language and other >> are just for decoration purpose... (Well, some may agree I guess ;-) ) > yes, currently, I'm almost a "one programming language only" people, I > can accept the existence of other languages, but I think they should > be optional, not necessory!
Necessary for what?! For you to use a computer? It seems as though you're being unreasonable (on many fronts), but if you are not fan of certain software, then don't use it. Don't bitch about how it was developed. Those folks (eg., gnome, X.org, etc.) produced a product the way that they did and then offered it to the masses for free. <cliche> Beggers can't be choosers. </cliche> Your a (self-proclaimed) junior programmer. Either deal with what's freely available to you while climb the programmer ladder, or develop it yourself (on paper, I guess). >> >> Tom >> >> >> -- >> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org >> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org >> >> > > > > -- > Gnu.Linux.(Debian|gNewSense).Gnome.(Mozilla|Gmail|Evolution|Scim|Flashplayer|Codeblocks) > Microsoft.Windows.(Vista|XP).(QQ|Game|Notepad++) Gcc.Gtkmm.Opengl > 初�U言�Z寂�纾�二�U�X�^寂�纾�三�U喜心寂�纾�四�U出入息寂��....于��欲心、嗔恚心、愚痴心不�贰⒔饷�，是���o上�U。 > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
