On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 08:55:10AM -0700, Evan Martin wrote: > On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 09:44:42AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > > The source of the bug was without a doubt, X, not totem. Recent XF4.3 > > > packages include a patch to rectify this bug - which, with a little help, > > > was found and fixed by Bastien, author of totem. Both totem and XF4.3 (when > > > crucial vendor patches are taken into account) operate very well. > > > > Ok, i apologize for being uninformed. But it still is no reason to > > 'being disapointed by X 4.3' and going back to older versions, > > especially for some minor application like totem, where numerous other > > solutions work fine, no ? > > I agree that moving to X 4.3 is a good goal; I was only disputing that > it's good enough to make the default. I like to think Debian moves > slowly because when it moves, it moves the right way. :)
Why ? I suppose it would be enough to fill a bugreport about this against the 4.3.0 experimental X packages, and Branden will either backport the fix from the XFree86 CVS servers, or implement a new fix. I suppose this may already have happened. You did fill a bugreport, did you not ? What packages were you experienced this problem with ? BTW, Jeff, you say it is fixed upstream. Do you know if it is both the 4.3.0 bugfix branch and the trunk ? Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
