kj wrote: > ... I can imagine there's some benefit to designing a battery > that delivers the cameras exact energy requirements rather than trying > to make the most of the fixed output of AAs. Given how small compact > digital cameras have become, AA batteries really just add unnecessary bulk.
I think you hit the nail on the head in your last sentence--the primary benefit to camera design of custom-designed batteries is probably the size _and_ _shape_, at least for ultra-compact cameras (such as my Casio Exilim EX-Z580 (which takes a flat, square NP-40 battery), and Casio's V7 and V8, which couldn't also use the NP-40 and uses a long, skinny battery because of the different internal lens layout; these are about the size of Canon's Digital Elph cameras). Daniel -- (Plain text sometimes corrupted to HTML "courtesy" of Microsoft Exchange.) [F]
