On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 10:03 -0400, Barclay, Daniel wrote: > Paul Johnson wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 16:19 +1000, CaT wrote: > > > >> I believe that would be the point the original poster was getting > at. If > >> aptitude is really doing that then it is in the wrong. > > > > I understood it, but given that this is how apt has always worked > and is > > documented to work, why change it now? > > Because it's error-prone. Because it's a poor-quality design.
Might want to check yourself before you wreck yourself: The same could be said for your HTML-spewing MUA. -- Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
