Paul Johnson wrote: > On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 16:19 +1000, CaT wrote: > >> I believe that would be the point the original poster was getting at. If >> aptitude is really doing that then it is in the wrong. > > I understood it, but given that this is how apt has always worked and is > documented to work, why change it now?
Because it's error-prone. Because it's a poor-quality design. Daniel
