On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 01:11 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote: > ----- Forwarded message from Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ----- > > User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) > (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) > From: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2008 12:14:03 -0500 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Bug#484129: release.debian.org: packages in tasks should be > fixed in priority and removed in last resort after > discussion SNIP
OK, my two cents worth: Testing is for testing. If you are not testing, you don't run it. Testing is NOT meant to be a working release, never has been. Nobody cares if Testing is broke. They will fix it. But it will bet fixed when they have the fix for it: no one will loose sleep over the non-functioning of Testing (except for the user trying to use Testing as his/hers workstation). Now the above is my observation, not the Debian policy. see: http://www.us.debian.org/releases/ and http://www.us.debian.org/doc/FAQ/ch-ftparchives#s-testing for the official Debian policy. Joey Hess has said on this list that in his experience Testing was seldom broke and seldom for any length of time and should work as a desktop for most people (Joey Hess is one of the Debian Developers). Any time you leave Stable, you leave all promise behind that Debian will work. I run Sid or Ubuntu. Sid has only become unusable for me only once (PAM broke during an update). If you insists on running Testing OR Unstable there is one program you MUST run: apt-get apt-listbugs you have to read the output before proceeding to any updating. This will save your bacon. HTH -- Damon L. Chesser [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linkedin.com/in/dchesser
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
