Ron Johnson wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 05/17/08 03:51, Rico Secada wrote:
On Fri, 16 May 2008 19:47:10 -0500
"Christofer C. Bell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 7:41 PM, Rico Secada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi.
Why is Debian not setup to be secure be default?
Not everyone is a security expert so imho the system should be fully
secured out-of-the-box.
So, do you have something worthwhile to say or is this just a case of
"the bull elephant trumpeting to the herd"?
https://alioth.debian.org/projects/d-sbd/
A couple of missing words inhibits the ability to really understand
what that project tried to do. Besides, it's 4.5yo and dormant.
If what you want is uber-security, there really is nothing to stop
you from running OpenBSD.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Good call Ron. I opted for OBSD as my soho LAN firewall - sits in the
corner, does it's thing and has been running with an exceptional uptime
aside from deliberate power downs. A real workhorse. The knack was
setting up the PF rules, but that's another story!! ;-)
A
--
"If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don't have to worry about the
answers." - Thomas Pynchon, "Gravity's Rainbow"
