On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 09:04:38 +0100 Matthew Macdonald-Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 20:04:48 +0100 > Michael C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Many swear seem to swear by sidux, though its claim to turn > > "unstable into a stable and reliable operating system for every-day > > usage" seems at odds with common sense, especially given its own > > advice to avoid dist-upgrades in the middle of "serious work" > > because "any package in sid can break at any time, and any person > > can be the first to discover it, especially if it is not a standard > > sidux package." > > > > I'm obviously never going to get a considered, impartial appraisal > > from their forum and IRC channel, so has anyone here tried sidux > > only to find that Testing was better suited to their desktop needs? > > > > Regards, > > > > Michael > > > If you want to run a "stable" version of Debian "Unstable/Testing", > why not use Ubuntu? As I understand it, Ubuntu takes the Testing > repos and makes them a bit more stable, then releases them. How do you make something a bit more stable!? Just go with testing - it's perfect. > Regards, > > Matt > -- > |Matthew Macdonald-Wallace > |Tiger Computing Ltd > |"The Linux Specialists" > | > |Tel: 0330 088 1511 > |Web: http://www.tiger-computing.co.uk > | > |Registered in England. Company number: 3389961 > |Registered address: Wyastone Business Park, > | Wyastone Leys, Monmouth, NP25 3SR > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
