On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 20:04:48 +0100 Michael C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Many swear seem to swear by sidux, though its claim to turn "unstable > into a stable and reliable operating system for every-day usage" seems > at odds with common sense, especially given its own advice to avoid > dist-upgrades in the middle of "serious work" because "any package in > sid can break at any time, and any person can be the first to discover > it, especially if it is not a standard sidux package." > > I'm obviously never going to get a considered, impartial appraisal > from their forum and IRC channel, so has anyone here tried sidux only > to find that Testing was better suited to their desktop needs? > > Regards, > > Michael If you want to run a "stable" version of Debian "Unstable/Testing", why not use Ubuntu? As I understand it, Ubuntu takes the Testing repos and makes them a bit more stable, then releases them. Regards, Matt -- |Matthew Macdonald-Wallace |Tiger Computing Ltd |"The Linux Specialists" | |Tel: 0330 088 1511 |Web: http://www.tiger-computing.co.uk | |Registered in England. Company number: 3389961 |Registered address: Wyastone Business Park, | Wyastone Leys, Monmouth, NP25 3SR -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
