-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 04/04/08 14:46, Steve Lamb wrote: > On Fri, April 4, 2008 11:57 am, Ron Johnson wrote: >> Is there a problem with that? (I must not be understanding your >> point...) > > Nope. The message I was responding to had responded to Paul stating > that there is a 1-2% increase, measurable by the tools cited, if one > compiled all programs and libraries for the specific architecture they > will be running on. This was after Paul pointed out that selected > applications are already compiled for targeted platforms if they get a > significant speed boost but that a total targeted compile for all of > Debian would be a waste of DD time and mirror space for the negligible > increase. > > My point was that the 1-2% measurable increase from compiling the rest > of programs and libraries that are not currently targeted compiled would > probably be measured in idle time since most programs and most libraries > are doing just that these days. Just because 1-2% can be measured from > an overall targeted compile does not mean it is meaningful in real world > cases.
Oh, ok. Then I totally agree with you. - -- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson LA USA We want... a Shrubbery!! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFH9otjS9HxQb37XmcRAmPXAJwNySWjzhzvs1exvuG3fA96Zw5oxgCgpmjp E5T1ywLDKHbRrPIbptkn0L4= =a9VV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
