-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 04/04/08 13:48, Steve Lamb wrote: > On Fri, April 4, 2008 11:33 am, Ron Johnson wrote: >> On 04/04/08 12:27, Steve Lamb wrote: >>> Soooo, your machine was idling faster? 'round here CPU time is rarely >>> a limiter. In fact I'm messing around with setting up Xen to split up the >>> functions of my main Linux box into 3 VMs. It's a PIII 667Mhz machine. > >> Mostly yes. But certain number-crunching apps will really benefit >> from subarch-dependent instructions. > > Oh, I agree, but Paul covered that by pointing out that certain > applications which would benefit from it already are compiled for > different architectures.
Is there a problem with that? (I must not be understanding your point...) - -- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson LA USA We want... a Shrubbery!! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFH9no3S9HxQb37XmcRAn78AJ9lfK2cOZS92JaADrfgAgLLTS5jiACfe921 bz3kHIJrMTZnmnr3Zc+CFGM= =oBrA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
