> Alan Ianson wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 08:46 +0800, hhding wrote: > > > >> why debian? > >> why centos? > >> > > > > Both are good I think. I don't know centos well myself so I stick with > > debian (what I know, to some degree anyway). > > > > > >> It seems same to me, and current we run debian as server. > >> But managers want run centos instead. > >> > > > > Did they say why? If you are setting up a new server then you can play > > with stuff till you decide what you want. Once it's all setup it's not > > easy to start over with a different distro.
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 09:08 +0800, hhding wrote: > > What they say is redhat contribute many patchs to linux kernel, True, redhat has always been a big supporter/contributor to linux development, but so has debian. > > and the > > redhat AS is proved stable in product environment. Also true, but so is debian. I see no good reason for a move like that but sometimes we just have to do what the manager says. I hope it doesn't create too many problems for you.. :) Do your managers know debian? Maybe ask them to have a look at the website and see what it's all about (although it's not easy to see just by looking at the website). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
