-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 02/26/08 19:08, hhding wrote: > What they say is redhat contribute many patchs to linux kernel, and the > redhat AS is proved stable in product environment.
Then why doesn't he want to use RH? (Yes, I know that CentOS is the beer-free version of RH, but still, it's *not* RH.) Anyway, just be thankful that management wants to use Linux, instead of forcing Windows down your throat. Also, since "they" are so grateful to RH for doing so much for Linux, suggest that they buy 1 or 2 RH licenses. > Alan Ianson wrote: >> On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 08:46 +0800, hhding wrote: >> >>> why debian? >>> why centos? >>> >> >> Both are good I think. I don't know centos well myself so I stick with >> debian (what I know, to some degree anyway). >> >> >>> It seems same to me, and current we run debian as server. >>> But managers want run centos instead. >>> >> >> Did they say why? If you are setting up a new server then you can play >> with stuff till you decide what you want. Once it's all setup it's not >> easy to start over with a different distro. - -- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson LA USA "(Women are) like compilers. They take simple statements and make them into big productions." Pitr Dubovitch -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHxMRLS9HxQb37XmcRAvLzAJ9usFjWcyF6bfAMv2zSlOkqpjn1hACgloHW 2NWYFIz68ByKZKCY1QHe/z4= =peSb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
