2008/1/2, Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 12:01:42PM +0100, Micaela Gallerini wrote: > > 2007/12/31, Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > > > This doesn't sound like an insult. Based on the package management > > > knowledge base you have demonstrated in this thread, it would seem > > > prudent. Most people aren't comfortable running a hybrid. > > > > > I didn't think that no one insult me, if you don't know me you don't > > know that I need some libraries or program unstable and the operative > > system stable. > > Yeah...I suppose that no much people using a hybrid system...^^ > > > I don't know about anyone else, but I'm having difficulty following the > double-negatives to determine exactly what you want vs what you need. >
what I want? excuse me but the question: I've installed some package non-stable in a os stable (etch), Do I need add the repository unstable to upgrade my system? It's not much difficult to understand. > Obviously, english isn't your first language and I'm wondering if a > language-specific debian user list would be of more help. > You say me don't write here, because my english is not correctly? Do you know that I write here since 3 years like nick name heba? And when I write like heba no one had a problem with my english? Now, in a moment my english is not correct? strange thing...^^ > If you need the OS to be stable but you need to be able to run some > unstable apps, I wonder if an Etch system with a Sid (and/or > Experimental) chroot (perhaps accesses with schroot) would be helpful? > Yeah!...then you understand...;) Sid is a os unstable and I won't a os unstable...^^ thanks...^^ -- "In internet il saper leggere è come il saper ascoltare nella realtà, chi sa ascoltare possiede le chiavi di molte porte". Rashna Micaela Gallerini
