2007/12/31, Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > This doesn't sound like an insult. Based on the package management > knowledge base you have demonstrated in this thread, it would seem > prudent. Most people aren't comfortable running a hybrid. > I didn't think that no one insult me, if you don't know me you don't know that I need some libraries or program unstable and the operative system stable. Yeah...I suppose that no much people using a hybrid system...^^
> > Unless you have a need for more recent things, just stick with plain > unadaulterated Etch. What's the problem? > I'm a programmer and I need some programs or libraries like could be php or apache or mysql, or postgre or other unstale and not stable. Then, the problem is: Can I run etch stable like operative system and I talk only of the operative system to reduce DoS attach, security bug etcetera etcetera with some stable package (network or office suite) and some unstable package (programming package)? > > Etch is very stable when you give it a sources list that is only for > Etch. Give it a messed-up sources.list and you get a messed-up system. > Etch is commercial stable, not very stable. Therefore, etch have yet much bug, because commercially the solved bug to considering stable a program is near at 62%, this don't mean that is completely stable. -- "In internet il saper leggere equivale al saper ascoltare nella realtà , chi sa ascoltare possiede le chiavi di molte porte". Rashna Micaela Gallerini
