-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Steve Lamb wrote: > Your suggestion, no. Johannes' constant harping, yes. Especially when he > starts engaging in strawman fallacies, ignoring things I am saying and > flipping arguments my mixing unrelated things together.
Sorry again, I never intended intended to 'harp'. Others and myself were just proposing alternative ways to your goal 'Tool for document management'. You were starting to be picky and claiming this and that requirement is not met by Latex, I have to use OOo. Your false presumptions about the flexibility of latex triggered me trying to clarify those issues that you got wrong. If there is a problem than this: you don't just take the advice, you claim that the advice is *unsuitable* to your problem, which it is not. You are perfectly free to ignore advice that you personally don't want to use, but instead you constantly claim that the advice is wrong. Peace! In a free world everyone may use the tool he/she is comfortable with. Johannes -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFG+pZSC1NzPRl9qEURAtYZAJ9+rYIiRyn+xkLWq7Y+FV2YrjoG6wCffdgk RMIgADrvLcaXLOFWEaffaic= =SVJq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
