-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Steve Lamb wrote: > Johannes Wiedersich wrote: >> If there is a problem than this: you don't just take the advice, you >> claim that the advice is *unsuitable* to your problem, which it is not. > > Johannes, who are you to judge the suitability of any particular tool to > *my problem*.
Steve, I never claimed that any particular tool is the perfect tool for *you*. I just claimed that this and that are the advantages of particular tools and that these tools meet this and that requirement of yours. You claimed that I am wrong and that your requirements can't be met by latex tools. > Part of that problem is me, my work habits, my perceptions and > desires and value judgements of different systems. How can you honestly say > that I am wrong in my work habits, in my perceptions, desires and value > judgements? That's the problem. I never claimed that. I claimed that certain tasks, IMHO, can be achieved more efficiently with latex tools. You said: no, in my case not, because this and that won't work or won't work like I want it. I tried to explain to you that latex tools are flexible enough to work the way you might want them to work. Your claims 'this and that don't work with latex' were wrong. That's all. > I have not said that LaTeX is unsuitable for > the problem. I have said it is not suitable for *me*. Only *I* can judge > that, not you or any one else. Agreed. Take your decision, use the tool *you* like. But don't make wrong claims about the limitations of other tools. I was just trying to help you, I am sorry that this effort was irritable. Johannes -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFG+03yC1NzPRl9qEURAtzkAJ9+Z18+NonoYC9DqjNuS4cl7L0jzwCffYLV J9bzRUdShcJZa4RjDx2CB7A= =/+q2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
