On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 13:49 -0400, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote: > Greg Folkert wrote: > > > Lookup sshfs (or shfs as it is commonly know) it is completely at the > > whim of the user. They use an existing well known, well vetted daemon > > (openssh-server) and in a local environment (meaning no slow links) with > > 100Mbit/sec, I get nearly line speed transfer rates (100Mbit/sec == > > 11MByte/sec). > > > > I have been using sshfs for the past couple of days. It is a great idea. But > I kind of feel (aka no data to support the claim) that sshfs is slow > compared to nfs (especially with large files). So if speed is an issue, the > OP might want to consider other alternatives as well.
Currently pulling 11,940KBytes/sec this moment, from a local (on 1 9.6GBit/sec backend fabric network switch away) -- greg, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Novell's Directory Services is a competitive product to Microsoft's Active Directory in much the same way that the Saturn V is a competitive product to those dinky little model rockets that kids light off down at the playfield. -- Thane Walkup
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
