-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 03/09/07 13:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On 8 Mar, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 09:14:53AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> Actually, our invasion of Iraq is much more likely to lead to a >>> broader war in the Mideast than Saddam was. >>> >> I have a real hard time believing that. The First Gulf War also >> proves your statement cannot possibly be true. >> > > Not at all. We (or at least I) were discussing conditions in 2003 > or later, not 1990. They are quite different. > > I'd think that someone in the military would at least be aware > of concerns that the current situation may lead to a broader regional > conflict between Sunni and Shia. It has certainly affected the balance > of power in the region, with Iran being the big winner to date.
Would the Sunni/Shia conflict have come anyway, whenever Saddam died? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFF8cXAS9HxQb37XmcRAr5DAJ9hhctkyhkyUa+TjieQ69eW5Pdd0QCfTRsE rPEN/hM4ZXoDvqTwz1XfuN0= =aDXb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]