-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 03/09/07 13:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On  8 Mar, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 09:14:53AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>>      Actually, our invasion of Iraq is much more likely to lead to a
>>> broader war in the Mideast than Saddam was.
>>>
>> I have a real hard time believing that.  The First Gulf War also
>> proves your statement cannot possibly be true.
>>
> 
>      Not at all.  We (or at least I) were discussing conditions in 2003
> or later, not 1990.  They are quite different.
> 
>      I'd think that someone in the military would at least be aware
> of concerns that the current situation may lead to a broader regional
> conflict between Sunni and Shia.  It has certainly affected the balance
> of power in the region, with Iran being the big winner to date. 

Would the Sunni/Shia conflict have come anyway, whenever Saddam died?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFF8cXAS9HxQb37XmcRAr5DAJ9hhctkyhkyUa+TjieQ69eW5Pdd0QCfTRsE
rPEN/hM4ZXoDvqTwz1XfuN0=
=aDXb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to