-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 02/11/07 09:31, Dave Sherohman wrote: > On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 12:36:55PM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: >> On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 09:10:46AM -0600, Dave Sherohman wrote: [snip] > Please note the lack of any complaint about tag-then-delete in my > earlier post. I even mentioned that I will continue to use mutt, which, > as has been mentioned earlier in the thread, also uses a tag-then-delete > model, although mutt continues to show messages marked for deletion (with > a "D" status marker so you know they've been marked but not really > deleted, as opposed to hiding them so it looks like they've been deleted > when they really haven't been). > > I was complaining solely about the use of "compact" to mean "delete". > Just because Microsoft chooses to arbitrarily redefine words does not > mean that we should follow them in doing so.
Redefine? No. It compacts the mail folder just like a kitchen trash compactor compacts refuse. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFzz8LS9HxQb37XmcRAiFrAJ9/5a+LVPH2bYqWzW70VwOYrnqBgACfcqro XehAj+DgFjJsH1kWPd3etdc= =80ef -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
