On Wednesday 10 January 2007 15:35, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 03:28:55PM -0800, tom arnall wrote:
> > On Tuesday 09 January 2007 23:08, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 05:19:51PM -0800, tom arnall wrote:
> > > > > > i replaced 'testing' with 'etch' today and haven't used apt-get
> > > > > > since.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > how do i tell which version (testing/stable) i'm running?
> > > > >
> > > > > regardless, what is your version of libc6? that's probably the best
> > > > > indicator at this point. one of my etch boxes is running
> > > > >
> > > > > dpkg -l | grep libc6
> > > > > ii libc6 2.3.6.ds1-8 GNU C
> > > > > Library: Shared libraries
> > > > > ii libc6-dev 2.3.6.ds1-8 GNU C
> > > > > Library: Development Libraries and Hea
> > > > > ii libc6-i686 2.3.6.ds1-8 GNU C
> > > > > Library: Shared libraries [i686 optimi
> > > > >
> > > > > stable is currently, per packages.debian.org, 2.3.2
> > > > >
> > > > > so figure out which you're running and that will clue you in to
> > > > > what to do.
> > > >
> > > > debian:/etc/apt# dpkg -l |grep libc6
> > > > ii libc6 2.3.6-7 GNU
> > > > C Library: Shared libraries
> > > > ii libc6-dev 2.3.6-7 GNU
> > > > C Library: Development Libraries and Header
> > > > debian:/etc/apt#
> > > >
> > > > does this mean i'm running etch?
> > >
> > > sounds like you're somewhere between sarge and etch. Etch is running
> > > 2.3.6.ds1-8 and sid is up to 2.3.6.ds1-10. But sarge is at 2.3.2 so
> > > you're definitely mostly etch.
> > >
> > > when did you last upgrade?
> > >
> > > I've lost track ofthis thread. what were we discussing?
> >
> > thanks for getting back to me. the thread started by my asking if there
> > was a way to upgrade without breaking my system. i had recently upgraded
> > and messed up gaim and a few other things. the profile edit for
> > gnome-terminal is still not right. from my original discussion there grew
> > a general discussion of relating to the repositories.
>
> Okay, I would say at this point you should probably go ahead and
> dist-upgrade yourself to get caught up. I don't know how long its been
> since you upgraded, but since you're mostly to etch already, its
> likely any breakage you currently have has already been fixed. With
> etch in freeze now and under 100 release-critical bugs left, I think
> you'll be in good shape.
>
> ymmv
>
> A
i have my apt-get parameter files set up properly, i think, but when i do an
apt-cache policy i don't like what i get, as follows:
debian:/etc/apt# cat sources.list
## Testing - Debian (currently Etch)
deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian etch main contrib non-free
deb-src http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian etch main contrib non-free
debian:/etc/apt# cat apt.conf
APT::Default-Release "etch";
APT::Cache-Limit 18000000;
debian:/etc/apt# apt-cache policy
Package files:
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
release a=now
Pinned packages:
W: Couldn't stat source package list \http://ftp.us.debian.org
etch/main
Packages
(/var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.us.debian.org_debian_dists_etch_main_binary-i386_Packages)
-
stat (2 No such file or directory)
W: Couldn't stat source package list http://ftp.us.debian.org
etch/contrib
Packages
(/var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.us.debian.org_debian_dists_etch_contrib_binary-i386_Packages)
-
stat (2 No such file or directory)
W: Couldn't stat source package list http://ftp.us.debian.org
etch/non-free
Packages
(/var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.us.debian.org_debian_dists_etch_non-free_binary-i386_Packages)
-
stat (2 No such file or directory)
debian:/etc/apt#
is it safe to proceed?
tom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
