On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:24:40 -0500 Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-01-11 at 14:03 -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 11:35:03PM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > debian:/etc/apt# cat apt.conf > > > > APT::Default-Release "etch"; > > > > > > It's not related to your problem, but 'etch' doesn't work as a > > > Default-Release. You must use 'testing'. Also this options is > > > needed only if you have sources for unstable as well, in order to > > > prevent an upgrade to unstable. > > > > > > > I know we all just argued about this, but I thought the consensus > > was that in fact they do work, provided one has the sources.list > > setup using "etch". Am I wrong? > > No you are NOT wrong. See my other reply to Andrei. I thought I demonstrated my point, though a bit late due to some mail problems (that's why it's sent twice). The link is in the other mail. Regards, Andrei -- If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough. (Albert Einstein) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
