On 31 Oct 2006, Douglas Tutty wrote: > > I use icewm. It does everything I want without the struggle of adding > features to a less featurful wm and is low on resource usage. It must > be fast because it doesn't get in the way on the 486. > > Doug. > Another vote for icewm. I've tried numerous others but always come back to icewm in the end.
Anthony -- Anthony Campbell - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Microsoft-free zone - Using Linux Gnu-Debian http://www.acampbell.org.uk (blog, book reviews, on-line books and sceptical articles) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
