Anthony Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 31 Oct 2006, Douglas Tutty wrote: > > > > I use icewm. It does everything I want without the struggle of adding > > features to a less featurful wm and is low on resource usage. It must > > be fast because it doesn't get in the way on the 486. > > > > Doug. > > > Another vote for icewm. I've tried numerous others but always come back > to icewm in the end.
For someone like me who grew-up with Windows, icewm was a good choice. I didn't want all the bloat in KDE or Gnome and, after some tweaking, icewm has gotten pretty close to my (good or bad) habits from Windows. Regards, Andrei -- If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough. (Albert Einstein) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
