Tyler Smith wrote: > I understand there have been some situations where an author attempted > to undermine the license by declaring an entire document to be > invariant. This is clearly not the case here, though.
That is immaterial. It's like saying that if code were pretty much
entirely free except for, say, a few choice segments or that if such
provisions were in the GPL and the original programmer declared the entire
codebase "invariant" it was still open and free.
Trust me, I can see both sides of this debate which is pretty much why I
kinda snicker at the whole notion of the GFDL. Code is one thing, technical
documentation is close to code. But "documents" by and large are not.
--
Steve C. Lamb | But who decides what they dream?
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | And dream I do...
-------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
