On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 04:23:36PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote: > Tyler Smith wrote: > > I understand there have been some situations where an author attempted > > to undermine the license by declaring an entire document to be > > invariant. This is clearly not the case here, though. > > That is immaterial. It's like saying that if code were pretty much > entirely free except for, say, a few choice segments or that if such > provisions were in the GPL and the original programmer declared the entire > codebase "invariant" it was still open and free.
Doesn't the GPL require you to maintain the copyright notice? Does that make it nonfree? -- hendrik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
