formless void wrote: >>Comparing auto specifications to what are free >>products in a >>totally unrelated discipline, is impractical and >>ludicrous, and a feeble >>attempt to be disingenuous. >> > > > To personal use, browsers are free but what about to > institutional use, are they free as well? Has > Netscape not required any license for the users who > are business and institutional organisation? > Nope. No license for business and institutional organizations. Next question.
> >>Using a browser that is poorly engineered won't kill >>me or any innocent >>bystanders. However, a poorly engineered automobile >>potentially can. The >>standard of excellence is a little higher for >>obvious reasons my friend. >>That's why this conversation is silly, and you are >>getting sillier by >>each attempted rebuttal. You seem to have far too >>much time on your >>hands. ;) > > > What about the case that you bought a car which has > got a hiden camera to trace your route. Would you > yell out? The same as true, if broswer doesn't have a > standrds, it can be very intrusive to the users > All I can say is, "wow." I have never read anything that made so little sense. -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
