-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Clive Menzies wrote: > On (22/05/06 11:38), Greg Folkert wrote: >> On Mon, 2006-05-22 at 03:32 -0700, formless void wrote: >>> I finally found that W3C has got >>> >>> User Agent Accessibility Guidelines at >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-USERAGENT/ >>> >>> Now my question is how authenticative W3C is? >> What do you mean by "authenticative"? Do you mean au?thor?i?ta?tive? >> >> au?thor?i?ta?tive >> adjective [snip] >> (WindowsXP ala Windows Vista) All without even addressing Standards >> other than the proprietary ones they have created. >> -- >> greg, [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> The technology that is >> Stronger, Better, Faster: Linux >> >> Use Debian GNU/Linux, its a bazaar thing >> >> NOTICE: Due to Presidential Executive Orders, the >> National Security Agency may have read this email >> without warning, warrant, or notice, and certainly >> without probable cause. They may do this without >> any judicial or legislative oversight. You have no >> recourse nor protection. > > Great answer!
When making such a short reply to such a long post, please snip out the bulk of the original email. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEczlYS9HxQb37XmcRAu2YAJwPtWIqqlsGoslO7V1WwtCmpQs7LACg7yD9 nzD9lbv1dWlCygJgYcQObk4= =kd1z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
