On 4/17/06, Doofus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <snip> > My potted understanding is that unix/linux applications generally output > postscript formatted data for printing and since Joe Public can't afford > a postcript capable printer, postscript interpreters (eg ghostscript) > have been developed which sit in between postscript data streams and non > postscript (HP PCL?) printers. Do correct me if I'm wrong with any of this.
I have never heard of a separate PS interpreter, they may be out there, but it isn't anything you need, because Linux can talk to PCL printers and PS printers are not all that expensive anymore. It is true that all printing in Linux goes through a PS stage, but there is software that translates to PCL. > I've been looking at the Brother range, in particular the HL-5250DN... > > http://www.printerbase.co.uk/spec/pdf/brother_hl5250dn.pdf > (spec on page 2) > The general impression I get is that for laser printers on Linux Brother, Samsung and HP are the best, but I don't have any specific recommendations. <snip> > > My main query in respect of this printer is Brother's "BR-Script". Does > anyone understand this? Is it a proprietary effort to do the same thing > as ghostscript, or does it mean you can actually treat the printer like > a real postscript machine? BR-Script is a PostScript work-alike. It is not called Postscript because Adobe owns PS and Brother does not want to pay them (similar to the situation regarding Mesa, OpenGL and SGI). You can send PS docs to a BR-Script printer. I hope that clears a few things up. Cheers, Kelly
