Ron Johnson wrote: > If you say so. It works well enough for my limited needs.
Clients that treat IMAP like a glorified POP should just remove it and
save the compile time. Seriously.
>> Harfs on IMAPS
> For those of use who don't use IMAPS, though...
Ah, yes, passwords in the clear.
>> All of those are far more serious than no reply-to-list.
> Any recommendation, besides mutt?
Sure, Thunderbird. Between lousy IMAP, broken IMAPS, bad wrapping, the
lousy "personalities" model and no reply-to-list the first 4 are pure
frustration while the last is a minor annoyance. The frustration is trying to
figure out why the firefox gang has let such a trivial thing last so long
while programming in far more complex features with a far smaller appeal. :(
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
-------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
