On Mon, 26 Sep 2005 22:46:48 -0700 Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote: > > If you say so. It works well enough for my limited needs. > > Clients that treat IMAP like a glorified POP should > just remove it and save the compile time. Seriously. When I've examined the ~/.evolution IMAP cache, I see headers, not mail bodies. > >> Harfs on IMAPS > > > For those of use who don't use IMAPS, though... > > Ah, yes, passwords in the clear. Private LAN. > >> All of those are far more serious than no > >> reply-to-list. > > > Any recommendation, besides mutt? > > Sure, Thunderbird. Between lousy IMAP, broken IMAPS, > bad wrapping, the lousy "personalities" model and no > reply-to-list the first 4 are pure frustration while the > last is a minor annoyance. The frustration is trying to > figure out why the firefox gang has let such a trivial > thing last so long while programming in far more complex > features with a far smaller appeal. :( I guess I've just gotten used to Evo. As soon as libsoup2.2 gets fixed, I'm going to install it on my new system. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
