Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 02:43:13AM -0700, David Wright wrote: >> I'll ignore the ad hominem. How about a poll at debianplanet? > > Because those have always had the power to command what developers do, > right? > >> ( ) No architecture should move forward untill all can move >> forward together. >> >> ( ) i386 and PPC should take priority; other architectures >> can follow when they're ready. >> >> I guess you're confident that the second option would only get 2 votes. > > Ah, yes. So the security team will have to support both potato and > woody, because both will be stable on different architectures.
That's not necessarily a bad thing, however. There's probably a decent number of server admins that would be happy if the security team supported potato after woody was released. It's come up on this list before... -- Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
