On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 08:09:07AM -0400, stan wrote: > On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 09:52:12AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > > rather than use the generic "stable" "testing" use the actual > > release name "potato" "woody" "sid". That way you are always > > running exactly what you mean to be running. > > Hmm, this would, I think, get exactly the oposite effect to what I;m trying > to achieve. > > It appears to em that the must current "stab;e" software for Debian is > alwasy doomed to be in testing, at least untill the release situation is > changed. So I would think that after the dust settles fro the release, I > would wnat to have my base be the new testinf, which is now unstable.
Then leave it at 'testing'. Note that the new testing after the woody release will *not* be what is now unstable - it'll start out at woody and be gradually upgraded where possible in the usual way. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
