On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 09:52:12AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > > > > So, assuming I want to keep reasonbly up to date, with current packages, > > what changes should I make to this, once woody goes gold (stable0? > > > > rather than use the generic "stable" "testing" use the actual release name > "potato" "woody" "sid". That way you are always running exactly what you mean > to be running. >
Hmm, this would, I think, get exactly the oposite effect to what I;m trying to achieve. It appears to em that the must current "stab;e" software for Debian is alwasy doomed to be in testing, at least untill the release situation is changed. So I would think that after the dust settles fro the release, I would wnat to have my base be the new testinf, which is now unstable. Or am I missing somehting here? The goal is to have relativly current (but not bleeding edge) version of the packages I am using. -- "They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]