On Fri, 29 Mar 2002, Adam Majer wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 02:59:16PM -0500, Mike Dresser wrote: > > > > Dselect runs a lot slower than under potato, enough that I threw another > > 16 meg ram in the machine. But that's a dselect db issue. > > It's because current setup _does_not_ scale. As sizeof(Packages) goes > up, I'll bet you that it will get a lot worse if nothing is done. > This is a known "feature" and will have to get fixed for Woody+1. Indeed. > > > Bug? > > > > 13 seconds to fire up X. I can deal with that.. Takes about 5 seconds on > > a similar box under potato, although that runs off and starts icewm as > > well. > > X became more modular and thus a bit more bloated. But at least it is a much > more managable setup than with 3.3.x series. Stripped out a bunch of modules out of X that i don't need(like the opengl, etc), haven't played with it enough to see if it made a difference. But yes, MUCH easier to setup than 3.3.x Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
