On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 02:59:16PM -0500, Mike Dresser wrote: > > Dselect runs a lot slower than under potato, enough that I threw another > 16 meg ram in the machine. But that's a dselect db issue.
It's because current setup _does_not_ scale. As sizeof(Packages) goes up, I'll bet you that it will get a lot worse if nothing is done. This is a known "feature" and will have to get fixed for Woody+1. > Bug? > > 13 seconds to fire up X. I can deal with that.. Takes about 5 seconds on > a similar box under potato, although that runs off and starts icewm as > well. X became more modular and thus a bit more bloated. But at least it is a much more managable setup than with 3.3.x series. - Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
