dman([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: > On Sun, Feb 03, 2002 at 11:48:52AM -0500, Wayne Topa wrote: > | dman([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: > > | > SpamAssassin does a pretty good job of tagging these so I can > | > automagically dump them. > | > | Then I am doing something wrong. Spamassassin doesn't do anything > | with them except put in "X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 required=5 > | tests=". > | > | Must be a configuration problem but I sure can't find it. :-( > > Are you using 'spamc' or 'spamassassin' as the filter? If spamc, is > spamd running? If you use "spamc -f" and there is a problem > communicating with the daemon, then the message is returned as > non-spam. spamd logs connections in syslog (also 'xconsole' shows the > messages). > > Save the message to a file and run it through > spamc -f | egrep "X-Spam|SPAM"
spamc spamc -f < mail/spam-test | egrep "X-Spam|SPAM" produces X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 required=5 tests= /var/log/syslog shows Feb 3 15:50:04 prince spamd[25251]: connection from localhost [127.0.0.1 ] at port 4344 Feb 3 15:50:05 prince spamd[5841]: processed successfully for mail:8 in 2 seconds Just got another one and it shows "X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 required=5 tests=" again. It has to be something I haven't done right in spamassassin.cf/.prefs. I have not added any tests to the end of .prefs -- I have a dream: 1073741824 bytes free. _______________________________________________________
