On 27 Jan 2002, Andreas Goesele wrote: >Thanks. But would that explanation be compatible with the fact that my >system most of the time functions all-right and then suddenly for some >time (one day and then a few minutes) not? If libc.so.6 wasn't >backwards compatible I would expect that the problem would arise all >the time. And why should the great majority of programs, in a more or >less up to date woody system, depend on glibc5 or glibc4? > >I continue to be mystified ...
Well, if the error is indeterminate, then I would start to suspect your hardware. Errors such as this often indicate bad memory, in my experience. Getting segfaults all the time is a classic example of this. Get hold of memtest86 (http://www.teresaudio.com/memtest86/) and give your memory a good going over. Running crashme off a boot floppy might also be, ah, interesting... >Andreas Goesele Cameron Kerr -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/~cameronk/
