At 06:40 AM 11/30/01 +0800, csj wrote: >On Friday 30 November 2001 05:44, John Griffiths wrote: >> At the risk of wandering WAAYY out into metaphysics... >> >> surely the novel is a binary? it can't be usefully modified and can >> only be read as-is. >> >> It'd have to be made available as a text file (or maybe printed with >> double spacing to allow annotation?) to be usefull >> >> Otherwise to make use of it you'd have to either re-type it, or scan >> and OCR >> >> which sounds analogous to de-compiling a binary to me. > >Unless you want the latest Stephen King, there's Project Gutenberg ><http://www.gutenberg.org/>. >
AH-HAH! correct me if I'm wrong but doesn't Project Gutenberg only cover works that are out of copyright?
