On Tue, 20 Nov 2001 09:36:51 +1100, mobtek mobtekl writes: >On Mon, 19 Nov 2001 11:57:35 -0600 >Nathan E Norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Yes. I solved it be throwing the cards in the garbage and installing >> real NICs. >> >> These cards were reporting overruns at a rate 10x that of properly >> received packets.
On Tue, 20 Nov 2001 09:36:51 +1100, mobtek mobtekl writes: >Wierd, I'm using two of these cards on 2.4.13 without any probs whatsoever. I' >ve generally found them to be really reliable cards. I've to second that: works like a charm, for a good year now, does ~ 1 GB traffic every day. I'd guess it doesn't depend solely on the chip but (also) on the actual manglingfacturer of the card (and in this case it's a back2back, eg crossover, connection also). cheers, &rw -- -- AOL would be a giant diesel-smoking bus with hundreds -- of ebola victims on board throwing dead wombats and -- rotten cabbage at the other cars. -- ASR about "Information Superhighway" analogy
pgpiQDncLotls.pgp
Description: PGP signature
