Thank you! I think I'll follow your suggestion... On Thu, 11 Oct 2001, Dave Sherohman wrote:
> > Actually, according to FHS, anything that might be modified in the > course of using (as opposed to doing maintenance on) the system > should not be placed under /usr. This enables admins to mount /usr > as read-only (good for security) during normal operation. > > Of course, if it's your system, you are completely free to ignore > this, but you should be aware that, on other peoples' systems, you > may find /usr to be unsuitable. I'd say /home is the best place to > put a directory like that. > > But CVS is probably the best way to handle the situation you > describe.
