Am 20. Sep, 2001 schwätzte Martin F Krafft so: > do you really not need the security apt servers if you run testing? i > know that the only dist they serve is stable anyway, but i seem to > recall that someone once said that they should always stay in.
I leave it. If a package hasn't been updated since stable came out or if it hasn't met the requirements to go from unstable to testing, then you're running the one from stable, so you want the security update. There's a minimal delay in testing, so if the bug causes a testing release that'll take longer to filter in than the security update. If the package has already been updated to something from testing, then I'd think the release into security won't do anything. In other words you'd have to wait for the fix to filter through unstable to testing. ciao, der.hans -- # [EMAIL PROTECTED] home.pages.de/~lufthans/ www.DevelopOnline.com # Two roads diverged in a wood, and I -- # I took the one less traveled by, # And that has made all the difference. -- Robert Frost # I, OTOH, prefer to just go stomping through the desert... - der.hans
