D-Man <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: D> I keep security in my sources.list, but I don't think I've ever gotten D> anything from them since I upgraded to woody. The situation where D> having security would be effective is if a package in security is D> "newer" (higher version number) than a package in woody. This is D> possible, though not probable.
I've actually heard people recommend keeping security around even if you're running testing. Security fixes get into the security archive ~immediately, but even a high-priority package update takes at least two days to move from unstable to testing. So keeping security around gets you security fixes faster, which can be important. -- David Maze [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.debian.org/~dmaze/ "Theoretical politics is interesting. Politicking should be illegal." -- Abra Mitchell
