Dear all, As the discussion progrsses i'd like to add my view to yours. First i'd like to state that LBS is a good thing in general. It will allow us to consolidate the considerable force of programmers If anyone wishes to make this kind of effort, i will support it by means of constructive comment, rather than destructive flames. One of the choices is to use RPM instead of .tar.gz, .deb or some other alternative. If LBS wants to use RPM, fine. RPM is also gpl so we have the ability to improve it together. I agree with the common view on this list that RPM does not stand a chance compared to DEB. I also agree that this is mostly due to policy rather than capabilities of both. In essence they do the same job but both have their better and worse parts. The inportant thing is that we help in making rpm the best thing arround. This involves examining rpm, deb and others as they are now, and building a new one incorperating the best qualities of all and call it rpm.
One big thing that is left out of the conversation up to now is that a good package system is more than 'just' a fileformat. Perhaps we should look at the major componets seperaty to get a better picture. 1) Fileformat 2) Database / Policy 3) Tools The first has no real impact at all. It needs to carry files and information about them. could be a tar.gz for all i care. The second is the most important of all, and discussed over and over in the previous messages, so i'm not repeating The third needs to 'get the job done' and if it does, the rest is a matter of taste. Thanks for reading my opinion, Nico de Haer _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
