Hi there, Try uwm - it's very very non-system hungry - it's built around the xwindows libraries rather than qt or gtk so it's very very fast. It's not fully gnome-compliant, but that doesn't mean it'll stop you using gnome applications.
I've used it for some time now. Matthew On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 02:29:03PM +1000, Steve Kieu wrote: > Hi, > > Anyone pls tell me how heavier the system resourses > will suffer if I run sawmill wm versus icewm? My box > only 35Mb RAM 100 Mhz CPU, ; icewm is good for all > purpose (gnome compliant, light, nice looking and > configure but not nice with netscape (see my last > email :-) ). I have tested wmmaker but it is not fully > gnome compliant. > > Regards, Steve > > ===== > S.KIEU > > _____________________________________________________________________________ > http://messenger.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Messenger > - Voice chat, mail alerts, stock quotes and favourite news and lots more! > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Matthew Sackman Nottingham, ENGLAND Using Debian/GNU Linux Enjoying computing
