On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 02:29:03PM +1000, Steve Kieu wrote: > Hi, > > Anyone pls tell me how heavier the system resourses > will suffer if I run sawmill wm versus icewm? My box > only 35Mb RAM 100 Mhz CPU, ; icewm is good for all > purpose (gnome compliant, light, nice looking and > configure but not nice with netscape (see my last > email :-) ). I have tested wmmaker but it is not fully > gnome compliant.
I would give PWM a try if I were you - http://www.students.tut.fi/~tuomov/pwm/ It is light and keyboard friendly. I run gnome-terminal on it. I don't run a lot of gnome applications but I haven't had any trouble so far. The deb at the site didn't work for me. It has a nice feature, you can load xterms and Netscape automatically in the same window. I dumped window maker for it. kent -- From seeing and seeing the seeing has become so exhausted First line of "The Panther" - R. M. Rilke
