on Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 04:55:51PM -0500, MaD dUCK ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > also sprach Glenn Becker (on Tue, 27 Feb 2001 04:14:48PM -0500): > > I don't really know what the purpose of xdm is. There are packages to > > 'prettify' it, but I just object to the whole thing. :-) > > well, do consider a console login and a 'startx', xlock running and > you out on lunch break, while i come into your office, hit > ctrl-alt-del, and scp all your confidential docs to me so that i can > then exploit all this knowledge... sure you'd find out, but then it's > too late. > > so if you dislike xdm, at least set NoZap in XF86Config!
Um. How about:
$ startx <args>; exit
...from console. I've even written a bash function to do this sanely
from my laptop, posted here recently.
Yes, launching X from a console w/o securing (or exiting) the console
session is a security hole. However, securing or exiting the console
session is trivial.
--
Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? There is no K5 cabal
http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/ http://www.kuro5hin.org
pgpD7ROx2Dgyd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
