WELL, i'm might have been somewhat too eager to spark a discussion ... the thing i'm wondering/confused about is that the 'worm' infects only redhat systems, according to this article at least ... strange eh ?
i only now had the time to read the securityfocus report, and yes indeed all linux's with these versions are vulnerable. anyway, good to know i turned of my machine this morning :) J.L. -----Original Message----- From: Phil Brutsche [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 4:00 PM To: Joris Lambrecht Cc: 'debian-user@lists.debian.org' Subject: Re: Debian is safer than this ? I REALLY HOPE SO ! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said... > <<The Register.url>> > > http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/16168.html Anything that runs the vulnerable versions of those programs is vulnerable, including Debian. The key is to keep up to date with security "patches" so that you aren't running the vunlerable versions of those programs. Problems like this will only affect those systems that aren't being maintains (through lack of time, administrator cluelessness, or whatever). - -- - ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Phil Brutsche [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG fingerprint: 9BF9 D84C 37D0 4FA7 1F2D 7E5E FD94 D264 50DE 1CFC GPG key id: 50DE1CFC GPG public key: http://tux.creighton.edu/~pbrutsch/gpg-public-key.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6ZwTf/ZTSZFDeHPwRAmgzAJ0RaaOELp++bBJ7kFGDYmkfUiR2VwCgzwD/ CnMTj0iEikSTcg9vjS24CcM= =xr0n -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
