on 5/23/00 1:37 PM, Steve Lamb at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Right, because were are still on simple editor. Again, I fail to see how
> Emacs qualifies since it isn't simple nor is it a text editor.
(Please note that I changed the subject line a couple messages back, to
remove the 'simple'.)
Have you perhaps never used emacs?
Saying emacs isn't a text editor is like saying that a Leatherman isn't a
pocket knife -- it may be literally true, but is extremely misleading in
fact.
john.
--
[ John S Jacobs Anderson ]------><URL:mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[ Genehack: Not your daddy's weblog ]------><URL:http://genehack.org>
