On Tue, May 02, 2000 at 10:19:00AM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote: > Monday, May 01, 2000, 10:55:47 PM, Richard wrote: > > I've had several debates featuring this very subject. > > Some very long and drawn out and heated. > > Then why keep bringing it up? I just find it amusing that the selling > point of a unix-like system is that it is modular and flexible so the first > thing most people point to is a Microsoft-esque monolith application. Yeah, > that works, great.
emacs is modular. Or maybe you just don't bother to learn about things you don't like? > > > This one... several times. It's no longer interesting. > > Makes it no less true. Makes it more boring, though. > > > If you don't like emacs... don't run it. If you don't want to add anything > > to the thread... I'm sure you've got a killfile somewhere nearby. > > I am adding to the thread. I'm adding a bit of truth to the religious > dogma. BS. You are adding *your opinion* which might not necessarily be the truth. Don't confuse the two things, they are not the same. Cheers, Chris goes to put on asbestos underwear...
